Celtic and Rangers: No Away Fans for Rest of SPFL Season
SPFL thông báo Celtic và Rangers sẽ không có cổ động viên đội khách trong phần còn lại mùa 2026/27. Quyết định sau sự cố tháng 3 và tranh chấp vé. | Key facts: - Rangers chỉ cấp 300 vé cho Celtic ở League Cup. - Celtic không chấp nhận, yêu cầu SPFL can thiệp. - Thỏa thuận tạm thời áp dụng cho toàn bộ SPFL. - Các bên sẽ xem xét khuyến nghị từ Independent Review. | Source: SPFL statement, September 2026 | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn
The SPFL has confirmed that no away fans from Celtic and Rangers will be present in each other's grounds for the remainder of the 2026/27 season. The decision follows Celtic's challenge to Rangers' offer of only 300 tickets for the Premier Sports Cup tie at Ibrox on September 13. Rangers had cut the allocation from a previously agreed total of around 2,500 seats in response to the trouble that marred the Scottish Cup quarter-final in March, when Celtic received the traditional allocation of about 8,000 tickets.
The background to this decision stems from the March 8 match, where clashes occurred between fans outside the stadium. An independent review was conducted, and its findings prompted the SPFL to reconsider arrangements for upcoming fixtures. For the Premier Sports Cup tie, Rangers proposed a reduced away allocation based on risk assessment. Celtic did not accept and sought a determination from the SPFL. After further discussions, an agreement was reached: no away supporters for matches between Rangers and Celtic in SPFL competitions for the rest of the season.
The SPFL statement emphasized that this temporary arrangement will allow both clubs, along with the SPFL, Police Scotland, and other stakeholders, to properly consider the findings and recommendations of the independent review. It will also provide greater certainty for supporters and those involved in matchday planning, avoiding repeated uncertainty over ticketing. All parties have committed to working constructively, with safety and security remaining the priority. The position will be reviewed if circumstances materially change.
Reactions from the clubs: Celtic expressed disappointment but respected the decision, while Rangers welcomed the move as necessary for safety. Fan groups from both sides criticized the ban, arguing it removes the traditional atmosphere of the Glasgow derby. However, Scottish football authorities believe this is a sensible temporary solution amid rising tensions.
Deeper analysis: This decision raises questions about the future of Glasgow derbies. Will it be possible to restore previous away ticket allocations? Or will the SPFL adopt a permanent no-away-fan model? Looking at other leagues like the Premier League, where clubs typically allocate around 3,000 away tickets, Scotland is moving in the opposite direction. This not only affects fan experience but also impacts ticket revenue and the league's image.
From a sporting perspective, the absence of away fans may reduce pressure on home players but also removes a motivational factor. Celtic and Rangers players often acknowledge that the intense atmosphere from both sides is a major driver. However, safety comes first, and past incidents have forced organizers to act.
Broader context: Scottish football has seen numerous incidents related to the Glasgow derby. In 2026, a match was delayed due to fans throwing flares. In 2026, police arrested dozens after brawls. Banning away fans is not unprecedented; some European leagues have applied such measures. However, for the SPFL, this is the first time a comprehensive ban has been imposed for an entire season.
Security experts suggest the ban is necessary for authorities to reassess procedures and infrastructure. Both Ibrox and Celtic Park have large capacities, and crowd control during derbies is always challenging. With facial recognition and surveillance technology, the future may allow partial restoration of away tickets.
Financially, clubs will lose some revenue from away ticket sales, but this is insignificant compared to broadcast and sponsorship deals. More importantly, the league's reputation is at stake. A derby without away fans will attract international media attention, potentially harming Scottish football's image.
Conclusion: The SPFL's decision is a bold but necessary step in the current context. It shows organizers are willing to sacrifice tradition for safety. However, this is only a temporary solution. Stakeholders need to quickly find a long-term solution, perhaps by enhancing security or reducing allocations while maintaining away fan presence. Football is a sport for fans, and removing them from the stands is a great loss. Hopefully, after this season, Glasgow derbies will return with a vibrant yet safer atmosphere.


Cầu thủ liên quan
Bài nổi bật
Celtic and Rangers: No Away Fans for Rest of SPFL Season2026-09-05
Saddil Ramdani leaves Persib Bandung: A signal of restructuring or a strategic loss ahead of the 2026/2027 Super League?2026-09-04
Barcelona's Silence Before Messi's Farewell: When Legacy Is Buried Under the Dust of Time2026-09-04
Enzo Fernandez €145m: Did Chelsea Sell a 'Black Sheep' or Did Man City Buy a 'Time Bomb'?2026-09-03
Buse's Historic Victory: When Stamina and Spirit Overcome All Limits at the US Open2026-09-03
Barcelona host Rayo Vallecano: Home strength and the low-block challenge2026-09-03
Mosimane Returns: Savior or Final Gamble for Bafana Bafana?2026-09-03
Balogun's Everton Collapse: Who Did the Medical Save?2026-09-03
Bài đề xuất
Barcelona's Silence Before Messi's Farewell: When Legacy Is Buried Under the Dust of Time2026-09-04
Offside Trap: Why £123m for Barcola Is Liverpool's Biggest Gamble After the Salah Era?2026-09-03
Dimarco and the Contract Puzzle: Inter Is Gambling With Its Own Future2026-09-03
Mosimane Returns: Savior or Final Gamble for Bafana Bafana?2026-09-03
Enzo Fernandez €145m: Did Chelsea Sell a 'Black Sheep' or Did Man City Buy a 'Time Bomb'?2026-09-03
When the Analysis Is Empty: A Data Lesson from Vietnamese Football2026-09-03
WSL 2026-26: Manchester City Defend Crown Amid Investment Wave and Renewed Ambition2026-09-05
Ueda Leaving Feyenoord: The Thin Line Between Budget and Champions League Ambition2026-09-03
Bài đề xuất
Deepfake Scam Targeting Ronaldo Fans: Warning from Study of 1,300 Fake Ads2026-09-05
WSL 2026-26: Manchester City Defend Crown Amid Investment Wave and Renewed Ambition2026-09-05
Como's Heroes: When Tactics Whisper, the Ball Roars2026-09-03
Werder Bremen and Youri Regeer: A Contract Built on Patience After 18 Months of Ajax Turmoil2026-09-05
When the Analysis Is Empty: A Data Lesson from Vietnamese Football2026-09-03
The Vietnamese Young Player Value Bubble: When Money Flows In Before Talent Grows Up2026-09-03
Balogun's Everton Collapse: Who Did the Medical Save?2026-09-03
Enzo Fernández to Man City: The £125m Symphony of Destinies2026-09-03
