Celtic and Rangers: No Away Fans for Rest of SPFL Season
SPFL thông báo Celtic và Rangers sẽ không có cổ động viên đội khách trong phần còn lại mùa 2026/27. Quyết định sau sự cố tháng 3 và tranh chấp vé. | Key facts: - Rangers chỉ cấp 300 vé cho Celtic ở League Cup. - Celtic không chấp nhận, yêu cầu SPFL can thiệp. - Thỏa thuận tạm thời áp dụng cho toàn bộ SPFL. - Các bên sẽ xem xét khuyến nghị từ Independent Review. | Source: SPFL statement, September 2026 | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn
The SPFL has confirmed that no away fans from Celtic and Rangers will be present in each other's grounds for the remainder of the 2026/27 season. The decision follows Celtic's challenge to Rangers' offer of only 300 tickets for the Premier Sports Cup tie at Ibrox on September 13. Rangers had cut the allocation from a previously agreed total of around 2,500 seats in response to the trouble that marred the Scottish Cup quarter-final in March, when Celtic received the traditional allocation of about 8,000 tickets.
The background to this decision stems from the March 8 match, where clashes occurred between fans outside the stadium. An independent review was conducted, and its findings prompted the SPFL to reconsider arrangements for upcoming fixtures. For the Premier Sports Cup tie, Rangers proposed a reduced away allocation based on risk assessment. Celtic did not accept and sought a determination from the SPFL. After further discussions, an agreement was reached: no away supporters for matches between Rangers and Celtic in SPFL competitions for the rest of the season.
The SPFL statement emphasized that this temporary arrangement will allow both clubs, along with the SPFL, Police Scotland, and other stakeholders, to properly consider the findings and recommendations of the independent review. It will also provide greater certainty for supporters and those involved in matchday planning, avoiding repeated uncertainty over ticketing. All parties have committed to working constructively, with safety and security remaining the priority. The position will be reviewed if circumstances materially change.
Reactions from the clubs: Celtic expressed disappointment but respected the decision, while Rangers welcomed the move as necessary for safety. Fan groups from both sides criticized the ban, arguing it removes the traditional atmosphere of the Glasgow derby. However, Scottish football authorities believe this is a sensible temporary solution amid rising tensions.
Deeper analysis: This decision raises questions about the future of Glasgow derbies. Will it be possible to restore previous away ticket allocations? Or will the SPFL adopt a permanent no-away-fan model? Looking at other leagues like the Premier League, where clubs typically allocate around 3,000 away tickets, Scotland is moving in the opposite direction. This not only affects fan experience but also impacts ticket revenue and the league's image.
From a sporting perspective, the absence of away fans may reduce pressure on home players but also removes a motivational factor. Celtic and Rangers players often acknowledge that the intense atmosphere from both sides is a major driver. However, safety comes first, and past incidents have forced organizers to act.
Broader context: Scottish football has seen numerous incidents related to the Glasgow derby. In 2026, a match was delayed due to fans throwing flares. In 2026, police arrested dozens after brawls. Banning away fans is not unprecedented; some European leagues have applied such measures. However, for the SPFL, this is the first time a comprehensive ban has been imposed for an entire season.
Security experts suggest the ban is necessary for authorities to reassess procedures and infrastructure. Both Ibrox and Celtic Park have large capacities, and crowd control during derbies is always challenging. With facial recognition and surveillance technology, the future may allow partial restoration of away tickets.
Financially, clubs will lose some revenue from away ticket sales, but this is insignificant compared to broadcast and sponsorship deals. More importantly, the league's reputation is at stake. A derby without away fans will attract international media attention, potentially harming Scottish football's image.
Conclusion: The SPFL's decision is a bold but necessary step in the current context. It shows organizers are willing to sacrifice tradition for safety. However, this is only a temporary solution. Stakeholders need to quickly find a long-term solution, perhaps by enhancing security or reducing allocations while maintaining away fan presence. Football is a sport for fans, and removing them from the stands is a great loss. Hopefully, after this season, Glasgow derbies will return with a vibrant yet safer atmosphere.


Cầu thủ liên quan
Bài nổi bật
Roberto Mancini Returns to Italy: A Youth Gamble After Three Missed World Cups2026-09-24
Ronaldo chooses Portugal for 1000th goal: 'The cherry on the cake' and the quiet power transition2026-09-24
The Transfer Market Does Not Lack Rumors, It Lacks Evidence2026-09-24
Busan IPark and the Loan-with-Obligation Trap: How Small Clubs Keep Raising Semi-Finished Products for the Giants2026-09-23
New Zealand Name 16-Man T20 Squad to Face India: Milne and Bracewell Return, Ravindra Out With Shoulder Injury2026-09-23
De Jong Back on the Grass: The Welcome News Buried on Line Five2026-09-23
Ireland, a Letter From 160 Athletes, and the Limits of UEFA's Power2026-09-23
Bài đề xuất
Simeone Meets Mourinho Again: When Both Have Changed — Oblak's Quiet Revolution and the Fate of Anti-Mainstream Football2026-09-21
Mbappé Rejects the Ronaldo Model at 41: The Limits of Longevity and the Succession Question Between France and Portugal2026-09-24
35,000 UNAM Students, 14 Campuses, and the Health Gap No Football Academy Will Publish2026-09-19
January Transfer Window: A Flurry of Potential Deals from Premier League to La Liga2026-09-11
Nguyen Quang Hai and the Market Shock: Lessons from Pau FC to Vietnamese Football2026-09-12
New Zealand Name 16-Man T20 Squad to Face India: Milne and Bracewell Return, Ravindra Out With Shoulder Injury2026-09-23
MLB Postseason Race Enters the Home Stretch: The Seeding Picture and the Questions That Need Verifying2026-09-24
ITTI: When the Saudi Pro League Fights with Trademarks, Not Goals2026-09-22
Bài đề xuất
The Drum Still Beats: Behind Persija Jakarta's Victory Over Bali United2026-09-11
The Wage Bill That Cannot Lie: A Transfer Window Seen from Shanghai2026-09-15
JJ Gabriel: A Contract That Cannot Be Signed, a Fee That Does Not Exist, and a Race That Has Already Started2026-09-19
Not Everything Goes: Simeone, Respect, and the Madrid Derby Lesson2026-09-22
Carlos Álvarez Is Registered: The Real Match Is América's Nine Foreign Slots2026-09-12
Lizzo wins harassment lawsuit: Lesson for Vietnamese sports2026-09-03
Hanoi FC and Harry Kewell: The Blind Spot Behind Three Defeats2026-09-21
